| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rafaeld
WI Forum Novice
Joined: 24 Jun 2009
Posts: 5
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:53 am Post subject: Suggestions for next updates... |
 |
|
Suggestions
This game is amazing, very good, but we need a version with support for multiplayer, 4vs4 with players via the Internet wi-fi, 3G and 2vs2 using bluetooth.
Other suggestions
-More units.
-More constructions
-Best graphics
-Regeneration of resources map
-Other civilizations |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hobbes
Semi-frequent Poster
Joined: 25 Jun 2009
Posts: 31
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 4:23 pm Post subject: Re: Suggestions for next updates... |
|
|
| rafaeld wrote: |
Other suggestions
-More units.
-More constructions
-Best graphics
-Regeneration of resources map
-Other civilizations |
Most of this stuff sounds like it belongs in an expansion more than a update.
I would be most interested in seeing multiplayer first, then deal with balancing issues in the following updates. Perhaps in the balancing process they can better differentiate the units in regards to their performance, such as speed, armor, firepower and rate of fire.
I would not like to see the regeneration of resources. Think of it this way. If there are little to no more minerals on the map and you and your opponent have approximately the same size army, it comes down to your micromanagement. This equates to improve your strategic skill, and a more fulfilling victory. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rafaeld
WI Forum Novice
Joined: 24 Jun 2009
Posts: 5
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| We need to have other ways to acquire resources, such as buildings or regeneration of specific resources in specific locations. The strategy would dominate the territory is located where the regeneration of resources. Without this the game is limited. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
elamre
Mega-Poster
Joined: 15 Dec 2008
Posts: 402
Location: the netherlands
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
yeah some money spikes 
and money need to respawn...
_________________
Hardcore |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hobbes
Semi-frequent Poster
Joined: 25 Jun 2009
Posts: 31
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rafaeld wrote: | | We need to have other ways to acquire resources, such as buildings or regeneration of specific resources in specific locations. The strategy would dominate the territory is located where the regeneration of resources. Without this the game is limited. |
If there must be a regeneration, then it should be time based, and should not respawn galaxite at its full state, but rather "grow" to its full state (small rocks then big rocks), but can still be harvested before its come to being a full chunk of galaxite.
If anything, the problem is galaxites gets sweeped off the map pretty fast. The bullpups suck in 1+ squares worth of galaxite per trip. I usually like to have at least 4 bullpups running, and 6 when they start to get too far, and my side of the map runs dry in just minutes.
Coming from starcraft, the minerals last you quite sometime and are not regenerable. I like this system very much. There's enough minerals on any given map to last an hour long game.
If anything i'd like to see the galaxite to be more 'dense' per square, meaning it takes more than just a single trip to wipe it clean. This would allow for longer games AND reduce screen clutter, since if the galaxite would be more per square, you wouldn't really require half-map worth of galaxite fields.
One thing i'd like to point out. Part of the fun in the game is having to expand, relocate your base, ecc. I'd hate to have permanent or "too fast" regenerating galaxite around. I'd like to be able to expand my base to other locations. That's how it is with most rts's, so why change what works?
Basically it would be nice if the galaxite lasted longer than it does, but still would eventually run out, forcing you to build a new hq and constructions elsewhere. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
